لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................

refers to legislation that comes from decisions made by judges in previous cases. Case law, also known as “common legislation,” and “case precedent,” offers a common contextual background for certain legal concepts, And just how They are really applied in certain types of case.

The criminal jail appeal is dismissed.appeal being time barred the appellant in his appeal hasn't challenged(Criminal Jail Appeal )

Generally, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (together with those in distinct violation of founded case law) for the higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, along with the case just isn't appealed, the decision will stand.

The explained recovery might be used, for the most, for corroboration on the main evidence, but by itself it cannot be a basis for conviction. They further submitted that the petitioners Bhoora and Mst. Mubeena Bibi also pointed out the place of prevalence. The explained memo of pointation is irrelevant and inadmissible as practically nothing was discovered due to these types of pointation. The place of prevalence plus the place of throwing the dead body were already from the knowledge of witnesses just before their pointation by the petitioners. Reliance is also placed on case law titled as “Ijaz Ahmad and Another v. The State” (1997 SCMR 1279) wherein it's been held because of the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:

4.       It goes without declaring that observations made hereinabove are just tentative in nature and strictly confined for the disposal of instant bail petition.

لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................

6.  Mere involvement within a heinous offence isn't any ground for refusing bail to an accused who otherwise becomes entitled to the concession of bail. The petitioner namely Bhoora was arrested in this case on 08.05.2018, because then He's driving the bars, he is previous non-convict, never involved in almost any case, investigation qua him is complete, his person is not any more necessary for further investigation, therefore, his continual incarceration would not serve any beneficial purpose at this stage.

The prosecution presented substantial evidence, which include eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature on the seized currency.

Therefore, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable which is dismissed along with the pending application(s), plus the petitioners may seek remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

If your employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced a possibility to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is generally only finished When the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the read more grievance notice. Within the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence and the petitioner company responded towards the allegations as such they were very well conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use being appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more

this Court is still left with no option but to direct the respondents to inform the promotion on the petitioner in next rank .(Promotion)

The latest amendment to this section signifies the legislature’s dedication to maximizing the effectiveness from the regulation in tackling contemporary challenges related to counterfeiting.

In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case legislation previously rendered on similar cases.